|
COG
|
Social Insurance Reform Discussion |
|||||||||
| |
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: SOCIAL_INS: Re: OWNERSHIP: FICA funds to ESOPs ???
Still, my point is that if he wants to get a bill done, he will work with what will likely be a Democratic Congress to craft one that they will let through. What I propose are some likely features. Mike In a message dated Thu, 19 Sep 2002 15:42:45 +0000, "William B. Ryan" <william_b_ryan@hotmail.com> writes: > > >"Given his prior experience as a compromising GOP Governor with a Democratic >state legislature, I think he will." >---------- > > > > >Very little compromise was needed.nbsp; For the most part, Texas Democrats are >ideologically indistinguishable from Texas Republicans. > > > > >This is a legacy from the Reconstruction era when the name "Republican" became >identified with the Carpetbagger occupiers from Yankeeland. > > > > >After the Reconstruction restrictions were lifted, Texas became ostensibly a >one-party state.nbsp; But in reality there were two parties within the >Democratic Party--"liberal" and "conservative."nbsp; The conservatives were >always in majority, though sometimes they were populist-conservative.nbsp; So >the Democratic primary became the real election.nbsp; The general election in >November became inconsequential, a mere formality. > > > > >Now there are geographical distinctions between Republicans and >Democrats--rural Texas remains Democrat and urban Texas is Republican because >of immigration into the cities from other states in recent decades.nbsp; One >of those immigrants was George W. Bush's father.nbsp; In Houston, for example, >when the Republicans became a majority, most Democrat office holders flipped >to the Republican Party and ran in the Repubican primary in the next election. > > > > >In Texas, the primaries - Democratic and Republican - remain far more >important than the election in November. > > > > > >----Original Message Follows---- > > From: Mbindnerdc@aol.com Reply-To: social_ins@cog.kent.edu To: >ownership@cog.kent.edu CC: social_ins@cog.kent.edu Subject: SOCIAL_INS: Re: >OWNERSHIP: FICA funds to ESOPs ??? Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2002 10:06:44 -0400 It >depends. If what I am proposing increases wealth for workers and is more >progressive than the current system - and if it mandates that workers have a >serious voice in the management of the firm (including factional >representation on the ESOP and corporate boards), and provided that deposits >are insured, the proposal might have a chance. In fact, what I am demanding >may be useful to the retirement lobby as, if nothing else, a poison pill. Some >argue that the real motivations behind the privatization movement are to >eliminate the progressive distribution of benefits and to enrich brokerage >houses. My proposals do neither of these things. In the end, conservatives may >oppose them as "galloping socialism." How they play depends upon the results >of the election and the political will of the President. If he really wants >some form of privatization to pass, and the Senate stays Democratic (and the >House follows), he will have to compromise to do so. Given his prior >experience as a compromising GOP Governor with a Democratic state legislature, >I think he will. We will see in November. To continue this thread, please DO >NOT RESPOND IN OWNERSHIP. Join and switch to social_ins@cog.kent.edu Michael >Bindner In a message dated Wed, 18 Sep 2002 2:13:26 PM Eastern Standard Time, >"Ronald L. Ludwig" writes: gt;In light of the Enron, Lucent, WorldCom and >similar debacles (and the coming nbsp;new legislative rules/limits on >investing 401(k) funds in employer stock), it's highly unlikely that any U.S. >politician (even one who supports both ESOPs and partial "privatization" of >Social Security) would support the Bindner proposal for diverting a portion of >the FICA tax to ESOPs. nbsp;The "retirement security" movement/lobby is far >too strong these days to permit that. gt; >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------MSN > Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: Click Here >
|