|
COG
|
Ownership Discussion |
|||||||||
| |
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: Re sorting the issues
Responding to Alan Zundel, >I agree, but worry about the people who would still be left out of any >significant ownership stake. >Kelso >had a universal plan where non-recourse credit was given to individual >citizens for investment rather than channelled thru trusts with beneficiaries >defined by some relation to a business. I too want to find ways for the capital-less to accumulate capital, especially those who are not connected to a private company. One problem that I think needs to be addressed when creating whatever solution is created, is including what Jeff Gates refers to as "up close capitalism". ESOPs are great because they allow capital-less people who have a natural "up close" connection to a business, to accumulate capital upon which they can have an impact. I am worried that a capital account, set up in my name, which simply sends me a dividend check each month, may be little more than another form of welfare. I am still disconnected from the capital which is adding to my income. Dan Bell -- Dan Bell International Program Coordinator Ohio Employee Ownership Center Kent State University Kent, OH 44242 (330) 672-3028 (330) 672-4063 fax dbell@kent.edu http://www.kent.edu/oeoc/
|