COG

Monetary Reform Discussion


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: MONETARY: LOCAL CURRENCIES IN THE 21ST CENTURY



Anyone can found a party, at least in the United States.  If we had proportional representation at the state and local level, or even at the national level in the House, such a party would assure that Muslims would vote.  Better an Islamic Democratic Party than an Islamic Republican Party (that would be scary).
 
Mike Bindner

Dan Parker <dan.parker@globaljusticemovement.org> wrote:

----- Original Message -----
From: Adavans@aol.com
To: monetaryreform@cog.kent.edu
Sent: Monday, April 05, 2004 10:41 AM
Subject: Re: MONETARY: LOCAL CURRENCIES IN THE 21ST CENTURY


Dan Parker wrote: "Mike, I very much support interfaith efforts, but personally feel more
comfortable with a non-denominational approach."

Al wrote: The Christian Democratic movement worldwide is pluralistic. While confessional
in its origins it long ago ceased to be a confessional movement. The Christian Democratic
movement is grounded in a Christian public philosophy...but one doesn't have to be a
Christian to espouse such a public philosophy. In any event there are no Christian
Democratic parties that espouse theocracy.

DP: Al, I am aware of the makeup and attitude of Christian Democratic parties in
such countries as Germany. If I am reading you correctly above, you are saying
that the movement is pluralistic, excepting it is founded in Christian public philosophy;
and that a party could be founded with a theocratic name, as long as it has nothing
to do with theocracy. Keeping in mind that one does not have to be, for
example, a Muslim to espouse ideals grounded in Islamic public philosophy, would
you support a party being named the Islamic Democratic Party? If not, why not?

Dan

Alan Avans
Prairie Village KS

To subscribe to this or another of COG's discussion groups register at:
http://cog.kent.edu/register.html
To unsubscribe from this group send a message to majordomo@cog.kent.edu
with a single line in the body of the message that says:
unsubscribe monetaryreform