COG

Monetary Reform Discussion


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: MONETARY: Who is the Bankers' "Toadie"?



Dear Monetary Reform members,
 
    Bill Ryan's thinking has some peculiar semantics.  He says that the problem is not the structure of the present system but rather the philosophy of those in charge.  Be it structure or 'philosophy',  there is a problem because the essential truth of the banking system (that it creates money) is always being obscured.
 
    Now the Governor of the Bank of England has in effect admitted the truth but he did so in a way which tried to obscure it.  He said that the banking system appeared to create money in the sense that individual banks receiving deposits can on-lend and that lending can end up as deposts elsewhere, and then went on to say that the process cannot continue indefinitely because of capital minimums and interest rates.  In other words, by linking his admission with the statement that the process cannot continue indefinitely, he was trying to hide the fact that in essence the money is created out of nothing right the way round the banking system, although the process is not unlimited.
 
    So Sir Edward's words are a grudging admission of the truth -- that the banking system creates money.  And repeating those words does not make me a toadie, thankyou, but rather one who fights to get out the truth about the banking system and who succeeded in eliciting it from Sir Edward..  When a Governor is forced to admit the truth, no matter how obscurely, the situation has improved.
 
    I am very pleased that Bill Ryan has on his shelf a 1827 book saying that the banking system creates money because, once again, we are in a situation of Bill's peculiar semantics (or, put differently, his  contradictions) with him saying (in a previous email) that it is factually incorrect to say that loans are created from nothing.  The statement "the banking system creates money" means "creates out of nothing." 
 
    Incidentally, William Patterson, in 1694, essentially admitted that the Bank of England would be creating money out of nothing because he arranged it that the Bank would have the benefit of interest on all monies it created out of nothing. 
Rodney Shakespeare.
 
PS  Peter Challen and I are only too willing to continue our correspondence with the Governor but we pinned him with two simple matters -- the advantages of using state-issued interest-free money for public capital spending and for wide-ownership private capital spending -- and, would you believe it?  he is refusing to reply, despite our reminders.