|
COG
|
Mondragon Discussion |
|||||||||
| |
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: Mondragon: Mondragon papers
Dear All Thanks to Terry Martin - currently working in Mondragon on the updating of the original Mondragon text, "Mondragon: An Economic Analysis" by Chris Logan and Henk Thomas - some additional information has become available about the training courses to which the draft conference paper refers. Lists of competencies and skills have been agreed or are undergoing development for members of boards and social councils, foremen and managers. For example, an agreed list of fourteen competencies and seven skills for managers includes change management, team management and commitment to the co-operative and its objective. At the shopfloor level, temporary members are required to take a four-hour orientation module. Candidates for full membership are required to take an additional seven modules: namely The Co-operative: An Organisational Project; Personal Development; Basic Organisation of the Co-operative; The Organisational Structure of the MCC; The History of Co-operativism; The Role of the Lagun-Aro Social Insurance Co-operative; and Pay Policy. Older members who may have missed out on a full high school education may take a two-year, 2000 hour course to qualify for a government diploma. It would be interesting to know whether - and, if so, to what extent - these courses are seen as a response to the disaffection among members in some co-operatives that Greenwood and Gonzalez identified in their Fagor study and that is also evident in attitudinal data from studies by the sociological research unit within what is now the Otalora Institute. Has any assessment of the effectiveness of the courses been undertaken, and, if so, with what result? Is there a problem in the apparent absence of measures whereby current members can engage in consciousness and confidence building and the acquisition of participative skills, including the interpretation of financial data and performance indicators? How do the orientation courses rate as a preparation for making more effective the "open book" information management philosophy which the co-operatives have embraced? What can be said about them in the light of industrial democracy experience in other countries and cultures? Are there other models or sources of advice which could be drawn to the attention of the co-operatives, for them to adopt, adapt or reject as they see fit? Is there perhaps some guidance that Davydd Greenwood can offer,in the light of his tantalising references to the failure of his team to develop an effective enough internal dissemination strategy for the results and methods of their work? Have other students of the Greenwood and Gonzalez material arrived at conclusions which may be helpful in remedying the problems of the co-operatives that it highlights, and enabling them to make the most of their strengths? Can a pooling of ideas about this key issue for the co-operatives now be commenced? Best wishes, Race Mathews -- Dr Race Mathews, Senior Research Fellow, Government and Governance Unit, Faculty of Business and Economics Monash University. Postal Address: 123 Alexandra Avenue, South Yarra, Vic, 3141, Australia. Phone/Fax: (03) 9826 0104.
|