|
COG
|
EOtrans Discussion |
|||||||||
| |
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: New York Times article
>Comments: SoVerNet Verification (on garnet.sover.net) > cecile-betit from pm0a3.rut.sover.net [207.136.196.131] 207.136.196.131 > Tue, 26 Sep 2000 06:02:37 -0400 (EDT) >From: "Cecile G. Betit" <cgbetit@Sover.Net> >To: "Steve Clem" <cclem@kent.edu> >Subject: Re: New York Times article >Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2000 06:03:09 -0400 >X-MSMail-Priority: Normal >X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.2106.4 >X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2106.4 > >Good morning, > >Yes, the work of the Grameen >Bank is quite amazing. The web >has a very amount of info. >It's default rate is very low and >it provides much needed capital >for small business. >Best wishes, >Cecile Betit > > > >-----Original Message----- >From: Steve Clem <cclem@kent.edu> >To: eotrans@cog.kent.edu <eotrans@cog.kent.edu> >Date: Monday, September 25, 2000 1:36 PM >Subject: Re: New York Times article > > >>>X-Originating-IP: [24.4.252.105] >>>From: "Don Ward" <donrward@hotmail.com> >>>To: cclem@kent.edu >>>Subject: Re: New York Times article >>>Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2000 16:52:44 GMT >>>X-OriginalArrivalTime: 25 Sep 2000 16:52:44.0922 (UTC) >>FILETIME=[06D985A0:01C02711] >>> >>>Steve: Last evening I was talking with at a young man who has a volunteer >>>position with the Presbyterian church headquarters here in Louisville. His >>>group's mission is not unlike ours ie getting at the poverty in the world >>>and finding ways to get at the gap between the haves and the have nots. I >>>told him a little about COG. He then shared the following story. He had a >>>paid position with an agency in southern India. During his stay he >>>discovered that some agency, bank or whatever made very low interest >loans, >>>mostly to cottage industries, most headed by women. It's purpose was to >put >>>them in business, probably not unlike the "village smithy" who once >thrived >>>in this country. Could it be that the agency he referred is the one you >>>mentioned. I am not sure how COG feels about cottage industries as >examples >>>of ownership. Assuming that the United Nation program is different could >the >>>program he described be something that we might want to learn more about, >if >>>COG has an interest.Don Ward >>> >>> >>>>From: Steve Clem <cclem@kent.edu> >>>>To: eotrans@cog.kent.edu >>>>Subject: New York Times article >>>>Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2000 10:13:47 -0400 >>>> >>>>One of the organizations dealing with the fact that more than 1/5 of the >>>>world's population live in extreme poverty is the United Nations >>>>Development Program. Part of its mission is to help countries achieve >>>>sustainable human development by assisting them in building a capacity >to >>>>carry out development programs in poverty eradication, employment >creation >>>>and sustainable livelihoods. >>>> >>>>The UNDP supports programs that assist in developing economic and social >>>>policies and programs to address the whole range of factors that >contribute >>>>to poverty. The UNDP supports programs that seek to, among other things, >>>>(1) generate opportunities for employment and (2) empower men and women >>>>through access to assets and productive resources. >>>> >>>>There should certainly be a place for employee ownership in the design of >>>>these poverty reduction strategies. UNDP could, for example, provide >some >>>>funding for education about employee ownership in countries where >employee >>>>ownership might be suitable and require such education as a part of its >>>>intervention. >>>> >>> >>>_________________________________________________________________________ >>>Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. >>> >>>Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at >>>http://profiles.msn.com. >>> >>> > >
|