|
COG
|
EOsubnat Discussion |
|||||||||
| |
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] RE: HOMESTEAD: Do trusts make workers second class owners?
Lynn, Always good to have your insight into employee ownership matters. Hope you're well. Mary -----Original Message----- From: LynnRWilliams@aol.com [mailto:LynnRWilliams@aol.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2001 5:25 PM To: EOsubnat@cog.kent.edu Subject: Re: HOMESTEAD: Do trusts make workers second class owners? I have just a few comments on this subject which relate to my understanding of our, that is the United Steelworkers' experience with trustees and our ESOPs. There are others who could articulate the issues involved in this more clearly and more accurately, but it is an interesting issue an I would like to say a little about it. Our intention from the beginning, leaving aside West Bend Lathe, was that worker ownership should be real, employees should have membership on the board and should have voting rights, should be fully reported to by the management in terms of the business, should have access through collective bargaining as well, in terms of maintaining the rights of worker-owners. This emphasis on worker owner rights or empowerment picked up momentum and intensity during the years when we were most active in employee ownership. The package of employee rights became the sine qua non of the Steelworkers' initiatives in this field. My understanding is that the law has improved in the U.S., so that much that we required in terms of pass through voting rights is now contained in the law. I am not arguing against Shaun's concerns so much as commenting. One of the downsides it seems to me of a more traditional, individual type of stock ownership is that it paves the way to employees simply selling their stock and bringing worker-ownership to an abrupt halt, as happened so frequently, as I understand it, in eastern Europe to the brave new schemes undertaken in the glow of the falling wall. All of our systems are of course the result of applicable laws. Of course it's not impossible to change them, but change doesn't come easily, in America partcularly, so that there is a great deal of effort, activity and imagination devoted to ensuring that existing laws ae administered as fairly as possible.
|