COG

EOpriv Discussion


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

EOpriv: What do 'Globalists' stand for?



 
What do 'Globalists' stand for?
 
By Bill Woollam
Sept. 28/03
 
 
 
"We are grateful to the Washington Post, the New York Times, Time Magazine, and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subject to the bright lights of publicity during those years but the world is now more sophisticated & prepared to march towards a world government which will never again know war but only peace and prosperity for the whole of humanity." -- David Rockefeller, Council of Foreign Relations/Bilderberg Group/Trilateral Commission, 5 June 1991.
 
Our television and news services honor those corporate rulers whose oil/arms/weapons industries propagate war on "uncivilized"  Third World nations to "share" their resources and "liberate" their citizenry.  Of course, "share" means to "steal"   and to "liberate" means to "exploit" for corporate profit.  To 'liberate' also means to convert the oppressed Third World peoples to the "rightness" of our 'civilized religion and hierarchical system'.  This is the contentious part of globalism.
 
Daniel Quinn in his book  "Beyond Civilization",  suggests our hierarchical civilization 'has introduced humanity to oppression, injustice, poverty, chronic famine, incessant violence, genocide, global warfare,  corruption, and wholesale environmental destruction.'  Our 'civilization' thing isn't working and hasn't been for quite some time.  His answer is simple; "If the airplane is in trouble, you don't shoot the pilot, you grab a parachute and jump.  To overthrow the hierarchy is pointless; we just want to leave it behind...to discontinue supporting it."
 
Well this Bilderberg/New World Order/ One-World-Government  thing is obviously not working either.  Taking a closer look at the fundamental belief system of "Globalist" businessmen,  we witness corporate executives and wanna-be rich people who firmly assert 'no matter what, ...profit is the bottom line.'  That is the loose screw...it is the 'no matter what' part that is the basis of wanton destructions on this planet.
 
'No matter what' we establish our 'civilization' across this globe...and then we make up 'safe' history to glorify colonialism and ignore the collateral damage.  'No matter what' we support the war-for-profits agenda of the New World Order club to sell and use depleted uranium tipped artillery shells, and then ignore the radio-active fallout which kills for years to come.  Does this sound like sensible, foreign relations to you?
 
 When we are willing to ignore pollution of our air and water, ignore the environmental havoc that affects the health of our children, ignore the radio-active fallout upon soldiers and civilians, ignore the low wages our working class is expected to survive on, and in the process create a drug-dependent culture of elderly and youth... all in the name of profit, then is it not time to question the bottom line?  Is it not time to question our "profit at whatever the cost" social belief system?  Is it not time for members of the Trilateral Commission, The Bilderberg Group, The Committee of Three Hundred, The Rockefeller/Rothechild club and the Bohemian Club... to give their heads a shake and notice just what is  going on in the name of globalism?
 
Unfortunately, the Bilderberg members actually buy into their own misinformation system...and like alcoholics they remain in denial of the everyday horrors resulting from the pursuit of "globalist" agendas.  What possible sense does mining for gold make when it leaves behind a whole community and its environment swimming in a river of arsenic tailings?  Where does the 'civilized' part come in, when we  chemically spray-by-air the Central Americans in order to dominate the cocaine industry?   Or does committing genocide on the Middle Eastern citizens for oil and heroin profits sound like an intelligent, Christian response?  And do we simply forget the toxic dioxins left to poison the once lush and fertile soil of Vietnam after we spray Agent Orange by the millions of gallons in order to "liberate" their peoples from the purported enemy?   Is this what the exponents of the New World Order would have us believe is the road to freedom?
 
It is time for all concerned citizens to give their head a shake...and ask what it is that religion, government, and education is standing for today.  What do we stand for?   What do I stand for?   And then comes the big one..."What am I going to do about it?"
 
Bill Woollam
675 Charlotte St
Duncan, BC, Canada
V9L 2V7
 
Some additional news to substantiate the above claims...

May 22,  George W. and his group signed Executive Order 13303 which grants US oil corporations operating in Iraq permanent immunity from any legal actions under US or international law over any offense such as worker safety, oil spills, or breach of contract; both France and newcomer Russia had extended credit to the old regime. (World Socialist Web Site, August 19, via Alanna Hartzok)

After being entertained by two years of lobbying, Bush's Environmental Protection Agency ruled that when polluters modernize their plants, they no longer have to install devices that curb pollution. That lets 17,000 power plants, oil refineries, pulp and paper mills, chemical plants and other industrial facilities save billions of dollars. Failure to install pollution controls on 51 filthy facilities is responsible for 5,000 to 9,000 premature deaths and 80,000 to 120,000 asthma attacks every year. Installing devices on these 51 plants would cut nearly 7 million tons of pollutants every year, half the air pollution generated by all electric utilities in the United States. Several environmental organizations and state attorney generals vowed to take the Bush EPA to court. (New York Times, Aug 27)