|
COG
|
EOpriv Discussion |
|||||||||
| |
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: EOpriv: LTV to go coop? Algoma worker/ownership scheme in CA bankruptcy
Dear Mike Wood, Your 4/26/01 question regarding LTV and the success ratio of last-gasp purchases by workers would probably fit better in the discussion on promoting employee ownership at the subnational level, eosubnat@cog.kent.edu. Nevertheless, allow me to respond to your question: >I'm wondering what the success ratio >on these last-gasp purchases by workers in industries that are >undergoing upheaval. The results of emergency surgery are never as >positive as those of a planned operation, so I would probably expect a >low success ratio where the corporation was already in bankruptcy. Regarding the success ratio of last-gasp worker buyout efforts, there are two "successes" to measure: 1. Success at completing the buyout 2. Success at running the company profitably going forward Our Center, the Ohio Employee Ownership Center at Kent State University, has worked with about 380 buyout groups and companies exploring employee ownership since 1987. Of these, 51 employing 11,000 people implemented some form of employee ownership. So about 1 out of every 7 considering ESOPs actually implemented them. Of the 51, 13 were implemented to avert a shutdown. The other 38 were non-stressed succession planning situations or employee benefit decisions by healthy companies. While not having the specific numbers at my finger tips, I would describe these 380 efforts as follows: 144 healthy businesses exploring of which 38 chose to go forward (one in four). 236 stressed situations exploring of which 13 successfully completed the buyout. Of the 236, about 52 (one in five) decided after their initial assessment interview with the OEOC to have a prefeasibility study done (paid for by state and local government grant money in most cases) by professional consultants. Following the results of the study, perhaps 16 were closed, 7 were retained by existing ownership utilizing the findings of the studies, 16 remained open under new ownership, and 13 became employee owned. Of all 51 ESOPs mentioned, only 2 failed. Assuming these were part of the 13 (which may be a mistake), 5 in 6 succeeded in preserving the jobs. Of all 51: 2 failed 1 repurchased the stock back from the employees 5 were subsequently sold by the employees 43 remained partially or wholly employee-owned The last time LTV went into Chapter 11, several ESOPs emerged around the late 1980s. These include Republic Container and Republic Storage Systems, which are still operating as 100% employee-owned companies, and Republic Engineered Steels, Inc. (RESI). RESI was an LTV bar mill division which was slated to be closed in 1989. The employees bought it and operated it for 10 years, keeping their jobs with union level wages and benefits, cutting $80 million in annual operating costs out of a $800 million budget through ownership education of the 4500 employees and employee involvement teams. Around 1999, the employees sold the company, each walking away with on average $40,000 in capital. Employment was downsized to about 3200. Under the current steel crisis, the company is now operating in Chapter 11. When compared to being shut in 1989 and putting 4500 people on the street, I'd say this was a great success. -- Dan Bell International Program Coordinator Ohio Employee Ownership Center Kent State University Kent, OH 44242 (330) 672-0333 << New direct number! (330) 672-4063 fax dbell@kent.edu http://www.kent.edu/oeoc/ http://cog.kent.edu
|