|
COG
|
EOpriv Discussion |
|||||||||
| |
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: EOpriv: Response to Dave Wheatcroft
Dave, Thanks for your well-expressed comments. I agree whole-heartedly with you that, where traditionally public services are involved, privatization is rarely in the employees' interest. Labor representatives rightly oppose it. Receiving a just wage for providing a worthy service to the public, which would otherwise be watered down or cancelled for empoverished beneficiaries, is a valid reason to oppose privatization. This would be the more typical privatization situation in countries like the UK. Looking at the former Soviet Union and its satellites, many traditionally commercial activities, which should depend on consumer demand, are being privatized. In these cases, the state is and perhaps should be no different from any other owner who has to determine whether the consumers are willing to pay a price that sustains a just wage and fair return. The question, then, is not whether investments in non-valued production should be redirected into production valued by consumers, but WHEN and HOW this transition should take place. The community has, in my opinion, a moral obligation to sustain those members who have fallen on hard times, but such charity is more effective through direct support, rather than the subsidizing of unneeded production. Employees, and their representatives, of such activities should accept the inevitable and work in a constructive way with the state to develop a future economic activity which can sustain just wages. Sometimes, redesigning the operation of the existing enterprise (improved quality and reduced costs) can bring its products back into demand -- employee ownership can make a big difference here. Sometimes, additional training and job search assistance is the only realistic avenue. But NEVER should the state simply wash its hands of the fate of a group of employees by simply transferring the ownership of the assets to them in lieu of a well thought out economic development plan which might be more costly to the taxpayers. -- Dan Bell International Program Coordinator Ohio Employee Ownership Center Kent State University Kent, OH 44242 (330) 672-0333 << New direct number! (330) 672-4063 fax dbell@kent.edu http://www.kent.edu/oeoc/ http://cog.kent.edu
|