|
COG
|
EOpriv Discussion |
|||||||||
| |
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: state's refusal to sell
Looking at the Indian experience, two reasons seem primary to me: 1. IDEOLOGICAL The govt. is basically uncomfortable in giving ownership to the employees as an idea and has enough of excuses to offer: lack of competence, unfriendly law and financing bodies, unhelpful bureaucracy,etc. 2. PRIVATE INTERESTS Officials have a vested interest in selling these assets cheap, almost at a throw away prices, to the private sector. The two work in combination, especially today when socialism is supposed to be something bad, and '1' is associated with it, and 'privatisation' is supposed to be the panacea of all ills of the PSUs and is primarily associated with '2'. Rahul ============================================================================== | Rahul Varman email: rahulv@iitk.ac.in | Assistant Professor | |----------------------------------------------------------------------------| | Office: | Residence: | | | | | Dept. of Industrial Management and Engg, | H.No.3047 | Indian Institute of Technology, | IIT Kanpur--208 016, | | Kanpur - 208 016 , India. | India. | | | | | Telephone: ++91-512-597970 | phone:++91-512-5987 ============================================================================== On Wed, 22 Mar 2000, Dan Bell wrote: > I am trying to compile a list of reasons why the state > would NOT want to sell a government owned enterprise or > service to the employees, assuming it was planning to > privatize the operation anyway. Do you have any ideas? > > Thanks. > > > -- > Dan Bell > International Program Coordinator > Ohio Employee Ownership Center > Kent State University > Kent, OH 44242 > (330) 672-3028 > (330) 672-4063 fax > dbell@kent.edu > http://www.kent.edu/oeoc/ > http://cog.kent.edu > >
|