|
COG
|
EOpriv Discussion |
|||||||||
| |
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Privatization in Russia
Russian PM says no going back on privatisation MOSCOW, Nov 22 (Reuters) - Russia's privatisation process, widely criticised for putting some of the country's best assets in the hands of a few well-connected insiders, cannot be reversed, Prime Minister Vladimir Putin said on Monday. "There can be no question of deprivatisation or redistribution of property," RIA news agency quoted Putin as telling a conference on state property management. But the 47-year-old premier said that in certain situations there could be "a civilised change of ownership." Putin was speaking against a background of several bitter disputes over ownership of former state enterprises and ahead of a December 19 parliamentary election in which some candidates have questioned the legality of past sell-offs. Former Prime Minister Yevgeny Primakov, a leader of the centrist Fatherland-All Russia movement, separately said on Monday that privatisation of certain enterprises should be reviewed, but without turning back the clock to the Soviet past. "If a privatised enterprise is worth it, if its resources are being stolen by new owners, the workers being driven out... and it is discovered that privatisation was not carried out correctly, if it was illegal, then we will review it retrospectively," Interfax agency quoted Primakov as saying. Russia's mass privatisation programme in the early to mid-1990s dismantled the centralised Soviet economy and led to the sale of tens of thousands of state enterprises. But some of the biggest firms, including oil and metals producers, were sold cheaply in so-called shares-for-loans deals to a small group of bankers and businessmen. Other privatisations have also been criticised for being carried out too hastily without netting the budget its due. Putin said "individual approaches" should be used to resolve disputes such as those which erupted recently at the Vyborg pulp and paper mill and at the Lomonosov porcelain factory. Workers at the Vyborg mill have locked out the plant's British owners despite attempts by bailiffs to enforce their rights, while an appeal is pending on a court ruling that the 1993 privatisation of the Lomonosov factory was illegal. -- Dan Bell International Program Coordinator Ohio Employee Ownership Center Kent State University Kent, OH 44242 (330) 672-3028 (330) 672-4063 fax dbell@kent.edu http://www.kent.edu/oeoc/
|