|
COG
|
EOnation Discussion |
|||||||||
| |
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [no subject]
Dear Deb First of all I wish you all good health and full participation in the vital aspects of your life. Sorry for this late answer on the PEPPER matrix but had a study trip to the US and field trips in Europe(among other places visited also Kent State University and Ohio Employee Ownership Center which I enjoyed very much). About the PEPPER matrix. When Francine Van Den Bulcke and I did the PEPPER II study we had to stick to this matrix which was developed in 1990 for the first PEPPER report. Personally, however, I have some arguments against the basic definitions of financial participation that were used for PEPPER and doubts about the gathered data. There were some critics on PEPPER especially from the German side since the categories more or less exclude investments plans/saving schemes that do not solely invest employee savings in their own company. Another argument is that especially cash based profit sharing has nothing to do with participation in ownership. Since cog is aiming at wider distribution of capital ownership you should skip the category of CPS. Both arguments of course have important impacts on the data. It will probably mean that German rating will be higher and France rating will be lower. Further comments would be to include -a measure or estimate of the magnitude of the public stock market in relation to total capital in a country, and the share owned by employees; -a division between employee ownership in public stock companies and in private closely held (smaller; although in Germany they might be quite big) companies (most figures are based on approved schemes and public stock market data, which means that PEPPER underestimates the amount of employee share ownership; and -a measure of real participation: the nature of voting rights. I can inform you that I am finishing a report for the European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working conditions which is more or less an update of PEPPER II. As soon as the report is made available I could add the newest developments and for instance the positions of both trade unions and employers. With kind regards Erik Poutsma ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Dr. Erik Poutsma University of Nijmegen Nijmegen Business School P.O. Box 9108 NL 6500 HK Nijmegen Netherlands Project Participation & Team-Entrepreneurship Tel.+31 24 3615628 Fax +31 24 3611933 Home Tel/Fax +31 24 6778978 E-mail: e.poutsma@bw.kun.nl Home E-mail: e.poutsma@mailbox.kun.nl
|