COG

EOnation Discussion


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Fwd: A Kelsonian Response to COG



To the COG network,

This was mis-addressed last night.  Sorry.  I hope it will be useful in 
addressing the globalization issue from an ownership position at all levels 
of concern.  Norm Kurland, The Center for Economic and Social Justice.
--- Begin Message ---
Dear Dan,

I totally agree that there should be a direct linkage between free and open 
global trade and an insistence on well-thoughtout and positive measures that 
promote economic justice and empowerment for U.S. as well as foreign workers 
through broad-based ownership policies and laws.  While I have difficulty 
supporting existing WTO and US trade policies because of their "fatal 
omission" (i.e. a lack of sensitivity to the growing wealth and economic 
power gap between the Bill Gates of the world and ordinary workers 
everywhere), I don't think COG should join Pat Buchanan and other modern 
mercantalists to support the erection of barriers to free and open trade.  
That leads to trade wars, and, as history shows, eventually real wars. . .and 
workers and consumers everywhere pay the price for the economic 
short-sightedness of our political leaders.   I also think Ashford and 
Shakespeare's use of the term "unfree market" is what COG should adopt in 
challenging the WTO; I probably would embellish the phase by calling the 
present system "the unfree and unjust market system."  All the best, Norm  
--- End Message ---