|
COG
|
EFES Discussion |
|||||||||
| |
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] RE: EFES: Opinion of the main Italian trade union CISL
Please delete me from this list I Methven > -----Original Message----- > From: Marc Mathieu [SMTP:marc.mathieu@pi.be] > Sent: 29 October 2001 16:03 > To: efes@cog.kent.edu > Subject: EFES: Opinion of the main Italian trade union CISL > > This is the opinion we received from the main Italian trade union (CISL) > about the European Commission staff working paper on financial > participation of employees in the EU: > > > > > > > CISL - ITALIAN CONFEDERATION OF WORKER'S TRADE UNIONS > > Dipartimento Democrazia Economia, Economia Sociale > Fisco e Previdenza > > > > > > Marc Mathieu > > Secretary General EFES > > marc.mathieu@ping.be <mailto:marc.mathieu@ping.be> > > > Rome, 29 october 2001 > > > Dear Marc, > > I send you Cisl opinion on Commission Staff working-paper "Finacial > partecipation of employees in the European Union" > > I've already sent this opinion to the Euopean Commission, Directorate > general for Employement - Rue de La Loi, 200. > > I hope that these considerations can be useful to improve the > staff-working paper. > > > > Best regards > Cisl National > Secretary > (Pier Paolo > Baretta) > > > > > > > > > CISL ITALIAN CONFEDERATION OF WORKERS' TRADE UNIONS > > Cisl opinion on the Commission staff working paper > Financial participation of employees in the European Union > Brussels, 26.7.2001 - SEC(2001)1308 - > > The Commission staff working paper is a good opportunity to rilaunch the > European initiative about employee financial partecipation . > As for the five questions put by the working paper ( see pag 12 ) we think > that : > > 1) We agree on the first question : a Commission plan for a > Community initiative on financial participation . > 2) To accomplish the first and the other four questions the Commission > should carry out the European Parliament Resolution on the Commission > report on PEPPER II ( 15 January 1998). In that Resolution the Europen > Parliament calls on the Commission : > · to conduct a study into the impact of financial participation > schemes in member states on employment , prodictivity and wage flexibility > , and to assess the conditions for introducing such schemes in enterprises > , in particular small and medium-sized enterprises; > · to implement an adequately financed programme to promote the > exchange of information and best practice , together with training for > both sides of industry in financial participation schemes; > · to set up a working party consisting of representatives of both > sides of industry , members of the European Parliament and Commission > experts to promote the introduction of PEPPER schemes in equivalent > conditions throughout the Community , in particular in transnational > enterprises ; the working party should consider all aspects of financial > participation which are of relevance to the EU , particulary those > outlined in its opinion of 9 April 1992 referred to above ; > · to study the need for a Community initiative concerning aspects > of policy on capital , for example a recommendation on the coordination or > harmonization of support for enterprises with a European dimension or to > ensure the promotion of capital -forming payments to or by migrant workers > , including where the latter thereby acquire participating interests in > the production sector in their home country , > · to develop pilot projects , along the lines it has itself > suggested , for the partcipation of undertakings e.g. in connection with > the privatisation of state enterprises , including projects in the > countries of central and eastern Europe . > > 3) The working party should lay down general principles at Europen > level and other measures that the Commission should include in its action > plan. > 4) The working party should also deal with the problem of > transnational obstacles pointing out that differences in taxation and in > compulsory social security contributions on income from financial > participation between Member States seriously hinder employee ownership in > international companies. > 5) Finally we think that a policy of promotion of employee share > ownwrship and participation should have a well dedicated budgetary line > .This direction followed the European Parliament in its Resolution of > January 1998 , requesting from the Commission an adeguate financing . > > We hope that these considerations can be useful to improve the staff > working paper . > > Best regards > > Cisl National Secretary > Pier Paolo Baretta > > > > --------------------------- > e-mail: p.baretta@cisl.it <mailto:p.baretta@cisl.it> > : democrazia.economica@cisl.it > <mailto:democrazia.economica@cisl.it> > tel: 0039068473454/5 > fax n. 0039068473280 > ********************************************************************* DISCLAIMER: This correspondence contains proprietary information some or all of which may be legally privileged. It is for the intended recipient only. If an addressing or transmission error has misdirected this correspondence, please notify the author. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not use, disclose, distribute, copy, print, or reply on this correspondence. The contents, comments and views contained or expressed within this correspondence do not necessarily reflect those of The AEEU, its subsidiaries, affiliates, associates or sister companies and are not intended to create legal relations with the recipient. If you want to know more about The AEEU, visit us on the web at the address below or contact our head office on 0208 462 7755 www.aeeu.org.uk *********************************************************************
|